Key Facts & Data Points

  • Code withdrawn: IS 1893 (2025) – the latest seismic design code.
  • Code reinstated: IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 – currently applicable.
  • Cost concerns raised by MoHUA:
  • Buildings: 10‑15% cost rise in Zones V & VI.
  • Infrastructure projects: up to 50% increase.
  • Scientific basis of the 2025 code: Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA), active fault mapping, near‑fault effects.
  • Seismic zonation (IS 1893‑2016):
  • Zone II – Low
  • Zone III – Moderate
  • Zone IV – High
  • Zone V – Very High
  • ~59% of India's landmass lies in zones III‑V.

Background & Context

  • The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) formulates technical standards for safety, including earthquake‑resistant design.
  • The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) oversees urban development and building regulations.
  • The 2025 revision aimed to incorporate cutting‑edge seismological research but was perceived as cost‑prohibitive and lacking stakeholder engagement.
  • Following MoHUA’s objections, BIS re‑instated the 2016 code, which remains the legal benchmark for structural design.

Significance for India / Governance / Policy

  • Disaster Management: Ensures that the majority of the country continues to follow a tested, implementable seismic design standard, crucial for life‑safety.
  • Infrastructure & Housing Costs: Reverting averts potential escalation in public‑sector project budgets and private housing costs, preserving fiscal space.
  • Stakeholder Consultation: Highlights the need for inclusive policy‑making when technical standards affect large‑scale investments.
  • Urban Planning: Aligns building approvals, municipal clearances and financing with a stable regulatory framework.

Related Constitutional / Legal Provisions

  • Disaster Management Act, 2005: Mandates the formulation of guidelines for disaster‑resilient construction.
  • National Building Code of India (NBC) – 2016: Incorporates IS 1893 standards for seismic design.
  • BIS Act, 2016: Empowers BIS to issue, amend or withdraw standards after due process.
  • MoHUA’s statutory role under the Urban Development Ministry to ensure that building norms are economically viable and socially acceptable.

Implications for UPSC Aspirants

  • Remember the current seismic code (IS 1893‑2016) and the four seismic zones.
  • Understand the policy trade‑off between scientific rigor and economic feasibility.
  • Relate the episode to broader themes of disaster‑resilient infrastructure, inter‑ministerial coordination, and stakeholder participation in standard‑setting.

Source: Economic Times (ET), 13 March 2026