Key Facts and Data Points
- White‑bellied Heron (Ardea insignis)
- Common names: Imperial heron, Great white‑bellied heron
- Conservation status: Critically Endangered (IUCN) and Schedule‑I species under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
- Population: Fewer than 60 individuals worldwide; ~45% of the global population in Bhutan; the Indian population is confined to Arunachal Pradesh (Lohit, Anjaw, Changlang districts) and recorded in Namdapha and Kamlang Tiger Reserves.
- Habitat: Fast‑flowing, free‑riverine Himalayan streams with low human disturbance; feeds on fish in rapids.
- Ecological role: Bio‑indicator of Himalayan freshwater ecosystem health.
- Kalai‑II Hydropower Project
- Capacity: 1,200 MW (run‑of‑river with small pondage).
- Location: Lohit River, Anjaw district, Arunachal Pradesh (right‑bank tributary of the Brahmaputra).
- Developer: THDC India Limited (central PSU), transferred from a private developer in 2023‑24.
- Status: Environmental Clearance (EC) granted despite concerns over omission of impact on the white‑bellied heron.
- Key features: Minimal storage, but still alters river flow and habitat continuity.
Background and Context
- The Lohit River originates in the Kangri Karpo range (Tibet) and traverses protected areas such as Kamlang Wildlife Sanctuary and Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary before joining the Brahmaputra.
- Arunachal Pradesh hosts several stalled hydropower projects; the central government has reassigned 13 of them to PSUs to accelerate execution, reflecting a strategic push for renewable energy.
- The white‑bellied heron requires undisturbed, fast‑moving water; dam construction leads to habitat fragmentation, reduced fish availability, and increased human disturbance—direct threats to its survival.
Significance for India / Governance / Policy
- Biodiversity conservation vs. energy security: The case exemplifies the policy dilemma of meeting India's renewable‑energy targets while safeguarding endemic, critically endangered species.
- Legal implications: Failure to incorporate species‑specific impact assessments may breach provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act (Schedule‑I protection) and the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (mandatory EIA).
- Institutional oversight: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) and State Pollution Control Boards are empowered to review ECs; any lapse can lead to judicial intervention.
- International commitments: Protecting Schedule‑I species aligns with India’s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and CITES.
Related Constitutional / Legal Provisions
- Article 48A of the Constitution – Directive Principle to protect and improve the environment.
- Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 – Schedule‑I species receive the highest level of protection; any project affecting them requires stringent clearance.
- Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 – Provides the legal basis for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notifications.
- Forest Conservation Act, 1980 – Regulates diversion of forest land for non‑forestry projects.
- National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – Enables speedy adjudication of environmental disputes.
Prepared for UPSC prelims and mains preparation.