Key Facts and Data Points

  • White‑bellied Heron (Ardea insignis)
  • Common names: Imperial heron, Great white‑bellied heron
  • Conservation status: Critically Endangered (IUCN) and Schedule‑I species under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
  • Population: Fewer than 60 individuals worldwide; ~45% of the global population in Bhutan; the Indian population is confined to Arunachal Pradesh (Lohit, Anjaw, Changlang districts) and recorded in Namdapha and Kamlang Tiger Reserves.
  • Habitat: Fast‑flowing, free‑riverine Himalayan streams with low human disturbance; feeds on fish in rapids.
  • Ecological role: Bio‑indicator of Himalayan freshwater ecosystem health.
  • Kalai‑II Hydropower Project
  • Capacity: 1,200 MW (run‑of‑river with small pondage).
  • Location: Lohit River, Anjaw district, Arunachal Pradesh (right‑bank tributary of the Brahmaputra).
  • Developer: THDC India Limited (central PSU), transferred from a private developer in 2023‑24.
  • Status: Environmental Clearance (EC) granted despite concerns over omission of impact on the white‑bellied heron.
  • Key features: Minimal storage, but still alters river flow and habitat continuity.

Background and Context

  • The Lohit River originates in the Kangri Karpo range (Tibet) and traverses protected areas such as Kamlang Wildlife Sanctuary and Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary before joining the Brahmaputra.
  • Arunachal Pradesh hosts several stalled hydropower projects; the central government has reassigned 13 of them to PSUs to accelerate execution, reflecting a strategic push for renewable energy.
  • The white‑bellied heron requires undisturbed, fast‑moving water; dam construction leads to habitat fragmentation, reduced fish availability, and increased human disturbance—direct threats to its survival.

Significance for India / Governance / Policy

  • Biodiversity conservation vs. energy security: The case exemplifies the policy dilemma of meeting India's renewable‑energy targets while safeguarding endemic, critically endangered species.
  • Legal implications: Failure to incorporate species‑specific impact assessments may breach provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act (Schedule‑I protection) and the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (mandatory EIA).
  • Institutional oversight: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) and State Pollution Control Boards are empowered to review ECs; any lapse can lead to judicial intervention.
  • International commitments: Protecting Schedule‑I species aligns with India’s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and CITES.

Related Constitutional / Legal Provisions

  • Article 48A of the Constitution – Directive Principle to protect and improve the environment.
  • Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 – Schedule‑I species receive the highest level of protection; any project affecting them requires stringent clearance.
  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 – Provides the legal basis for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notifications.
  • Forest Conservation Act, 1980 – Regulates diversion of forest land for non‑forestry projects.
  • National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – Enables speedy adjudication of environmental disputes.

Prepared for UPSC prelims and mains preparation.