Overview
The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 was passed by Parliament to establish a uniform and predictable mineral taxation framework. The Bill restricts State taxes and levies on mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands, aiming to reduce fiscal uncertainty and encourage domestic mineral production and investment.
Key Features of the Amendment
1. Union Control over Mineral-Bearing Lands
- Amends Section 2 of the principal MMDR Act, 1957
- Explicitly brings "mineral-bearing lands" under Union government regulatory control
2. Capping State Levies (New Section 9D)
- States cannot impose tax, cess or other levies on:
- Mineral rights
- Mineral-bearing lands
- Whether based on mineral quantity, value, or royalty
- Exception: Unless permitted under conditions prescribed by the Centre
3. Invalidation of Past Dues (Retrospective Relief)
- Unpaid or unrecovered levies before the amendment will be invalid
- Amounts already paid will NOT be refunded
4. Rule-Making Power
- Amends Section 13 to empower the Central Government
- Central Government can frame rules specifying parameters for State levies
Constitutional and Legal Framework
Legislative Entries Governing Minerals
| Entry | List | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| Entry 54 | Union List | Regulation of mines/mineral development (public interest) |
| Entry 23 | State List | Mines/mineral development (subject to Union legislation) |
| Entry 50 | State List | Taxes on mineral rights (Parliament can limit) |
| Entry 49 | State List | Taxes on land/buildings (includes mineral-bearing land) |
Key Supreme Court Judgment (2024)
- Case: Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India
- Bench: 9-judge Constitution Bench (8:1 majority)
- Ruling:
- States have legislative competence to tax mineral rights under Entry 50
- States can tax mineral-bearing lands under Entry 49
- States can recover past tax dues retrospectively from 1st April 2005
- Royalty under MMDR is a contractual payment, not a tax
Significance of the Amendment
Benefits
- Tax Certainty: Addresses high, multiple, and unpredictable levies
- Uniformity: Promotes uniform taxation across States, reducing compliance costs
- Investment Climate: Reduces uncertainty and mining costs
- Domestic Production: Encourages domestic mineral production
- Critical Mineral Security: Supports National Critical Mineral Mission objectives
Concerns Raised
- Federalism Issues
- Restricts State taxation powers under Entry 49 and 50
- Questions about Parliament's power to restrict taxation of land (Entry 49)
- Reduces fiscal autonomy of mineral-rich States
- Conflict with Supreme Court 2024 Judgment
- Bill seeks to invalidate certain unpaid past levies
- Alters legal consequences of the Supreme Court's ruling
- Raises concerns over separation of powers
- Article 14 Concerns (Equal Protection)
- Invalidates unpaid past levies but does not refund already paid amounts
- Unequal treatment between companies that paid vs. those that didn't
- Excessive Delegation
- Leaves conditions for State taxation to executive (Central Government)
- Critics argue Parliament should lay down clearer principles
- Impact on State Revenues
- Reduces revenue base of mineral-rich States
- Raises balance issues between national governance and State financial interests
Evolution of MMDR Act
Original Act (1957)
- Enacted under Entry 54 of Union List
- Central legislative control over mines and minerals
2015 Amendment
- Mandatory auction for mineral concessions (replaced discretionary grants)
- Established District Mineral Foundation (DMF) for welfare of mining-affected areas
- Created National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET)
- Introduced stringent penalties for illegal mining
2016 Amendment
- Defined "leased area"
- Permitted transfer of captive mining leases (subject to conditions)
- Facilitated mergers, acquisitions, resolution of stressed assets
2020 Amendment
- Allowed companies without prior coal-mining experience to participate in auctions
- Promoted wider participation and FDI in coal sector
2021 Amendment
- Removed distinction between Captive and Merchant mines
- Captive mines permitted to sell up to 50% production in open market
- Reinforced auction-based allocation
2023 Amendment
- Removed 6 critical minerals from atomic minerals list (Lithium, Titanium, Beryllium, Niobium, Tantalum, Zirconium)
- Opened critical minerals to private and foreign investment
- Introduced Exploration Licences
- Empowered Centre to exclusively auction critical mineral concessions
- Aligned with net-zero emissions by 2070 commitment
2025 Amendment
- Introduced Mineral Exchange concept
- Established registered electronic marketplaces for transparent trading
- Aimed at reducing market opacity, cartelisation, price manipulation
- Removed 50% sale cap on captive mines
Key Institutions
District Mineral Foundation (DMF)
- Established under 2015 Amendment
- Purpose: Fund welfare of mining-affected areas and persons
- Focus: Health, education, livelihoods, local infrastructure
- Source of funds: Contributions from mining lease holders
National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET)
- Established under 2015 Amendment
- Purpose: Accelerate mineral exploration
- Funding: Contribution from holders of mining leases and prospection licences
National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM)
- Aims to strengthen India's critical mineral security
- Components:
- Domestic exploration
- Overseas mineral acquisition
- Recycling
- Processing, Beneficiation, Refining
- Securing entire critical-mineral value chain
Mineral Exchange
- Introduced in 2025 Amendment
- Registered electronic marketplace
- For transparent trading of minerals, concentrates, processed metals
Way Forward: Recommendations
- Strengthen Centre-State Coordination
- Create permanent mechanism for mineral governance
- Coordinate taxation, leases, auctions, production, development
- Improve DMF Outcomes
- Transparent, outcome-based utilization of funds
- Measurable benefits for health, education, livelihoods, infrastructure
- Leverage Deep Ocean Mission
- Explore polymetallic nodules and sulphides in Indian Ocean
- Minerals: Nickel, Cobalt, Copper, Manganese
- Develop indigenous deep-sea mining technologies
- Ensure stringent environmental safeguards
- Strengthen NCMM
- Expand domestic exploration
- Acquire critical mineral assets abroad
- Build capabilities in processing and refining
- Strengthen Mine Closure Provisions
- Progressive mine closure
- Land reclamation
- Ecological restoration throughout mining lifecycle
- Curb Illegal Mining
- Satellite-based monitoring
- Drone surveillance
- GPS-based mineral tracking
- E-permits system
Conclusion
The MMDR Amendment Bill, 2026 attempts to reconcile two competing objectives: fiscal certainty for the mining sector and constitutional fiscal autonomy of States. While uniformity in mineral taxation can support domestic production and critical-mineral security, its implementation must:
- Preserve federal balance
- Provide predictable revenues to mineral-rich States
- Remain consistent with constitutional limits on Parliament's legislative power
- Align with Supreme Court's 2024 judgment